Minimum Lovable Project
This commit is contained in:
parent
56f2da1ea3
commit
07fc525bc1
|
@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
layout: post
|
||||
title: Minimum requirements to participate in a project
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- opinion
|
||||
- opensource
|
||||
- jenkins
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
When waiting for containers to build, or dependencies to download, my mind
|
||||
tends to wander. Yesterday it wandered to the plight of new contributors to
|
||||
modern free and open source projects; how much they must do before even
|
||||
attempting to collaborate! I started a [Twitter
|
||||
poll](https://twitter.com/agentdero/status/1120713097986002944), asking:
|
||||
|
||||
> *In order to participate in my open source project, you must have at
|
||||
> minimum:*
|
||||
>
|
||||
> * *GitHub account*
|
||||
> * *Google account*
|
||||
> * *Slack account*
|
||||
> * *signed CLA faxed to legal*
|
||||
|
||||
The results were overwhelmingly in favor of requiring, at minimum, a
|
||||
[GitHub](https://github.com) account. This was the result I expected and
|
||||
certainly matches the anecdotal experiences I have had in recent years.
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately Twitter polls doesn't allow multiple selections, as the reality
|
||||
for most people is that they need _all_ of those, as [Felix
|
||||
Frank](https://twitter.com/felis_rex/status/1120735653422075910) alluded to in
|
||||
his response. When I think of the [Jenkins](https://jenkins.io) project in
|
||||
particular, the "registration" process for new contributors might typically
|
||||
include:
|
||||
|
||||
* A GitHub account.
|
||||
* An LDAP account to access Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins-on-Jenkins.
|
||||
* Connecting to IRC over Freenode, or a [Gitter](https://gitter.im) channel,
|
||||
depending on their focus area.
|
||||
* Subscription to a mailing list operated by Google Groups.
|
||||
* A Google account, if they want to participate in Hangouts or comment on
|
||||
Google Docs for various design documents.
|
||||
|
||||
As we have discussed newer services to incorporate into the community, I have
|
||||
grown weary over the number of logins we would expect each contributor to
|
||||
maintain.
|
||||
|
||||
I do not find myself reminiscing about the "good old days" of open source
|
||||
software, when things were more oriented around Bugzilla, CVS/Subversion, mailing
|
||||
lists, and IRC. There too we had account sprawl, it was perhaps a bit more
|
||||
non-obvious.
|
||||
|
||||
For the Jenkins project, the ideal world would mean that everything linked to
|
||||
our project's LDAP infrastructure. With services like GitHub, That is obviously
|
||||
not possible, so the next best thing would be to use GitHub as the source of
|
||||
identity for all our other development services. Yes this couples us more
|
||||
closely with GitHub, but at least then we would stop pretending we're not
|
||||
already intricately bound with GitHub as a service.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
As many projects approach the summer, and Google Summer of Code kicks off, I
|
||||
encourage you to consider the number of accounts, repositories, groups, and
|
||||
other information a student or new-contributor must have in order to _start_
|
||||
adding to the community.
|
||||
|
||||
Our goal as stewards of such projects, should be to push that number towards
|
||||
zero.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue