Update the control port decision in the blog post
This commit is contained in:
parent
b45ccf859a
commit
4ac7c53b81
|
@ -29,6 +29,15 @@ communicate with that protocol. My first thought was just lines of JSON encoded
|
|||
over the wire, but there are a number of practical problems with trying to send
|
||||
JSON over a unix socket, for example.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
**Update 2020-10-30**: I have since decided to shy away from Nanomsg for the
|
||||
control socket and instead have opted for a small HTTP server listening on a
|
||||
unix socket. I chose this approach to make the debugging and client
|
||||
interactions much easier, even a totally bash-based shell step would be able to
|
||||
interact with it!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
For the first implementation, I am planning to have a single long-lived socket
|
||||
for the duration of a pipeline's execution by the agent. By adding the `ipc`
|
||||
field to the invocation file (below), I should have the flexibility to allow an
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue