Minor copy edits from a second proof-read
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ee7a845a0
commit
8227dc72b6
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Platform Engineering are:
|
|||
applications and data.
|
||||
* **Data Engineering**, treats data as a product, ensuring that high quality
|
||||
data sets are accessible to internal users.
|
||||
* **Ruby Infrastructure**, helps Scribd adopt or upstream major ecosystem improvements
|
||||
* **Ruby Infrastructure**, helps Scribd adopt or upstream major ecosystem changes
|
||||
which will improve organizational and operational performance of Ruby and
|
||||
Rails.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Tools teams where the edges of our respective responsibilities lie is one of
|
|||
those good healthy debates every organization should have as it grows. A year
|
||||
ago much of engineering was flat with lots of generalists, compare that to
|
||||
today where both Product and Engineering groups are learning that
|
||||
specialization when appropriately applied can be helpful.
|
||||
specialization when appropriately applied can be quite helpful.
|
||||
|
||||
What has also been personally challenging about hiring in Data Engineering is
|
||||
my relative inexperience in the field. My jam has always been backend service
|
||||
|
@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ lot of work to do, changing from a mindset of "dumping in the data lake" to
|
|||
where Product and other parts of Engineering are viewing data as a more
|
||||
integral part of their work. Both in generating clean data but also by
|
||||
utilizing derived data sets to make more personalized or responsive user
|
||||
experience.
|
||||
experiences.
|
||||
|
||||
The barriers between "data platform" and "production engineering" remind me of
|
||||
the now outdated silos between application developers and operations engineers.
|
||||
DevDataOps. Maybe DataDevOps?
|
||||
I'm not sure what to call it, DevDataOps? Maybe DataDevOps?
|
||||
|
||||
I'll have to figure out the hashtag later.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue