Switch to using a Stateful Set, which is for stateful applications
There doesn't seem to be any tangible difference in the performance between using a Deployment or a StatefulSet but the docs say it's for stateful apps.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8b728ffe6
commit
33987205a5
|
@ -10,19 +10,6 @@ items:
|
|||
metadata:
|
||||
name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
|
||||
- apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
namespace: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
storageClassName: azurefile
|
||||
accessModes:
|
||||
- ReadWriteMany
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
storage: 5Gi
|
||||
|
||||
- apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Service
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
|
@ -63,18 +50,29 @@ items:
|
|||
serviceName: 'jenkins-@@USER@@'
|
||||
servicePort: 80
|
||||
|
||||
- apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
|
||||
kind: Deployment
|
||||
- apiVersion: apps/v1beta1
|
||||
kind: StatefulSet
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
namespace: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
serviceName: 'jenkins-@@USER@@'
|
||||
replicas: 1
|
||||
strategy:
|
||||
type: RollingUpdate
|
||||
selector:
|
||||
matchLabels:
|
||||
app: 'jenkins-@@USER@@'
|
||||
volumeClaimTemplates:
|
||||
- metadata:
|
||||
name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
namespace: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
accessModes:
|
||||
- ReadWriteOnce
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
storage: 5Gi
|
||||
template:
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
|
@ -85,10 +83,6 @@ items:
|
|||
fsGroup: 1000
|
||||
# https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/2630#issuecomment-344091454
|
||||
runAsUser: 0
|
||||
volumes:
|
||||
- name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
persistentVolumeClaim:
|
||||
claimName: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: "jenkins-@@USER@@"
|
||||
image: "rtyler/codevalet-master:latest"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue