Falling back to hard_link when that happens, retrying can lead to very
long wait before copying works (up to 4secs in my tests) while
hard_linking works straight away.
Looks related to https://github.com/openzfsonosx/zfs/issues/809Closes#13838
We allowed `[badges]` to inherit from `[workspace.package.badges]`
This was a bug:
- This was not specified in the RFC
- We did not document this
- Even if someone were to try to guess to use this, it is inconsistent
with how inheritance works because this should inherit from
`workspace.badges` instead of `workspace.package.badges`
While keeping in mind that `[badges]` is effectively deprecated.
In that context, I think its safe to break support for this without a
transition period.
Fixes#13643
We already only partially check it and it has been a source of false
positives.
While there is trust in the job, contributors and maintainers go into
the job assuming there is a problem and it takes time to break that
assumption.
If we lose trust in the job, we then won't trust it when it fails for
other reasons.
This also increases the risk of us not seeing other problems
`bump-checks` is meant to find if the steps in the job get re-arranged
to make this one of the early ones.
Cleanup linting system
There are a number of problems with the current linting system, most notably that lints could run without `-Zcargo-lints` being set. This PR fixes that issue and a few others that are low-hanging fruit.
gate some libc usages under cfg(unix), drop os_info features
Places few `libc` usages under `cfg(unix)`. That didn't remove it from tree, but still looks cleaner.
Drop features from os_info crate, as serde support currently unused.
They are still nominally gzipped, but using `Compression::none()` makes
them consistent even across zlib and zlib-ng, and this fixes checksum
differences in the testsuite. There is a one-time update of all those
checksums to catch up with this change though.
This assumes that if any of the machine applicable fixes in
a diagnostic suggestion is a duplicate, we should see the
entire suggestion as a duplicate.
refactor(toml): Split out an explicit step to resolve `Cargo.toml`
### What does this PR try to resolve?
This builds on #13664 and #13666. Currently, once we have deserialized `Cargo.toml`, we pass it to a large machinery (`to_real_manifest`, `to_virtual_manifest`) so that
- `Cargo.toml` is resolved
- `Summary` is created
- `Manifest` is created
This splits out the resolving of `Cargo.toml` which is mostly workspace inheritance today.
While splitting logic conjoined like this can be a bit messy in the short term, the hope is that overall this makes the logic easier to follow (more condensed, focused sections to view; more explicit inputs/outputs).
In particular, I hope that this will make it clearer and easier to shift more logic into the resolving step, specifically the inferring of build targets for #13456.
### How should we test and review this PR?
This is broken up into very small steps in the hope that it makes it easier to analyze a step.
### Additional information
bors
Weihang Lo
renovate[bot]
Thibault Saunier
Ed Page
Scott Schafer
klensy
Sebastian Thiel
Josh Stone
Maybe Waffle
Paul Mabileau