use std::env; use cargo::core::dependency::Kind; use cargo::core::{enable_nightly_features, Dependency}; use cargo::util::Config; use crate::support::project; use crate::support::registry::Package; use crate::support::resolver::{ assert_contains, assert_same, dep, dep_kind, dep_loc, dep_req, loc_names, names, pkg, pkg_dep, pkg_id, pkg_loc, registry, registry_strategy, remove_dep, resolve, resolve_and_validated, resolve_with_config, PrettyPrintRegistry, ToDep, ToPkgId, }; use proptest::{prelude::*, *}; /// NOTE: proptest is a form of fuzz testing. It generates random input and makes shore that /// certain universal truths are upheld. Therefore, it can pass when there is a problem, /// but if it fails then there really is something wrong. When testing something as /// complicated as the resolver, the problems can be very subtle and hard to generate. /// We have had a history of these tests only failing on PRs long after a bug is introduced. /// If you have one of these test fail please report it on #6258, /// and if you did not change the resolver then feel free to retry without concern. proptest! { #![proptest_config(ProptestConfig { max_shrink_iters: if env::var("CI").is_ok() || !atty::is(atty::Stream::Stderr) { // This attempts to make sure that CI will fail fast, 0 } else { // but that local builds will give a small clear test case. std::u32::MAX }, result_cache: prop::test_runner::basic_result_cache, .. ProptestConfig::default() })] /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro. #[test] fn passes_validation( PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60) ) { let reg = registry(input.clone()); // there is only a small chance that eny one // crate will be interesting. // So we try some of the most complicated. for this in input.iter().rev().take(20) { let _ = resolve_and_validated( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], ®, ); } } /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro. #[test] fn minimum_version_errors_the_same( PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60) ) { enable_nightly_features(); let mut config = Config::default().unwrap(); config .configure( 1, None, &None, false, false, &None, &["minimal-versions".to_string()], ) .unwrap(); let reg = registry(input.clone()); // there is only a small chance that eny one // crate will be interesting. // So we try some of the most complicated. for this in input.iter().rev().take(10) { // minimal-versions change what order the candidates // are tried but not the existence of a solution let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], ®, ); let mres = resolve_with_config( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], ®, Some(&config), ); prop_assert_eq!( res.is_ok(), mres.is_ok(), "minimal-versions and regular resolver disagree about weather `{} = \"={}\"` can resolve", this.name(), this.version() ) } } /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro. #[test] fn removing_a_dep_cant_brake( PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60), indexs_to_remove in collection::vec((any::(), any::()), ..10) ) { let reg = registry(input.clone()); let mut removed_input = input.clone(); for (summery_idx, dep_idx) in indexs_to_remove { if removed_input.len() > 0 { let summery_idx = summery_idx.index(removed_input.len()); let deps = removed_input[summery_idx].dependencies(); if deps.len() > 0 { let new = remove_dep(&removed_input[summery_idx], dep_idx.index(deps.len())); removed_input[summery_idx] = new; } } } let removed_reg = registry(removed_input); // there is only a small chance that eny one // crate will be interesting. // So we try some of the most complicated. for this in input.iter().rev().take(10) { if resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], ®, ).is_ok() { prop_assert!( resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], &removed_reg, ).is_ok(), "full index worked for `{} = \"={}\"` but removing some deps broke it!", this.name(), this.version(), ) } } } /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro. #[test] fn limited_independence_of_irrelevant_alternatives( PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60), indexs_to_unpublish in collection::vec(any::(), ..10) ) { let reg = registry(input.clone()); // there is only a small chance that eny one // crate will be interesting. // So we try some of the most complicated. for this in input.iter().rev().take(10) { let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], ®, ); match res { Ok(r) => { // If resolution was successful, then unpublishing a version of a crate // that was not selected should not change that. let not_selected: Vec<_> = input .iter() .cloned() .filter(|x| !r.contains(&x.package_id())) .collect(); if !not_selected.is_empty() { let indexs_to_unpublish: Vec<_> = indexs_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.get(¬_selected)).collect(); let new_reg = registry( input .iter() .cloned() .filter(|x| !indexs_to_unpublish.contains(&x)) .collect(), ); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], &new_reg, ); // Note: that we can not assert that the two `res` are identical // as the resolver does depend on irrelevant alternatives. // It uses how constrained a dependency requirement is // to determine what order to evaluate requirements. prop_assert!( res.is_ok(), "unpublishing {:?} stopped `{} = \"={}\"` from working", indexs_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.package_id()).collect::>(), this.name(), this.version() ) } } Err(_) => { // If resolution was unsuccessful, then it should stay unsuccessful // even if any version of a crate is unpublished. let indexs_to_unpublish: Vec<_> = indexs_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.get(&input)).collect(); let new_reg = registry( input .iter() .cloned() .filter(|x| !indexs_to_unpublish.contains(&x)) .collect(), ); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))], &new_reg, ); prop_assert!( res.is_err(), "full index did not work for `{} = \"={}\"` but unpublishing {:?} fixed it!", this.name(), this.version(), indexs_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.package_id()).collect::>(), ) } } } } } #[test] #[should_panic(expected = "assertion failed: !name.is_empty()")] fn test_dependency_with_empty_name() { // Bug 5229, dependency-names must not be empty "".to_dep(); } #[test] fn test_resolving_empty_dependency_list() { let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), Vec::new(), ®istry(vec![])).unwrap(); assert_eq!(res, names(&["root"])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_only_package() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo")]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("foo")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo"])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_one_dep() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo"), pkg!("bar")]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("foo")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo"])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_multiple_deps() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo"), pkg!("bar"), pkg!("baz")]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("foo"), dep("baz")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "baz"])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_transitive_deps() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo"), pkg!("bar" => ["foo"])]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("bar")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "bar"])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_common_transitive_deps() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo" => ["bar"]), pkg!("bar")]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("foo"), dep("bar")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "bar"])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_with_same_name() { let list = vec![ pkg_loc("foo", "https://first.example.com"), pkg_loc("bar", "https://second.example.com"), ]; let reg = registry(list); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![ dep_loc("foo", "https://first.example.com"), dep_loc("bar", "https://second.example.com"), ], ®, ) .unwrap(); let mut names = loc_names(&[ ("foo", "https://first.example.com"), ("bar", "https://second.example.com"), ]); names.push(pkg_id("root")); assert_same(&res, &names); } #[test] fn test_resolving_with_dev_deps() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!("foo" => ["bar", dep_kind("baz", Kind::Development)]), pkg!("baz" => ["bat", dep_kind("bam", Kind::Development)]), pkg!("bar"), pkg!("bat"), ]); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("foo"), dep_kind("baz", Kind::Development)], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "bar", "baz", "bat"])); } #[test] fn resolving_with_many_versions() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2"))]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("foo")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.2")])); } #[test] fn resolving_with_specific_version() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2"))]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "=1.0.1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same(&res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.1")])); } #[test] fn test_resolving_maximum_version_with_transitive_deps() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("util", "1.2.2")), pkg!(("util", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("util", "1.1.1")), pkg!("foo" => [dep_req("util", "1.0.0")]), pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("util", ">=1.0.1")]), ]); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1.0.0"), dep_req("bar", "1.0.0")], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0"), ("util", "1.2.2"), ]), ); assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.0.1").to_pkgid())); assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.1.1").to_pkgid())); } #[test] fn test_resolving_minimum_version_with_transitive_deps() { enable_nightly_features(); // -Z minimal-versions // When the minimal-versions config option is specified then the lowest // possible version of a package should be selected. "util 1.0.0" can't be // selected because of the requirements of "bar", so the minimum version // must be 1.1.1. let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("util", "1.2.2")), pkg!(("util", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("util", "1.1.1")), pkg!("foo" => [dep_req("util", "1.0.0")]), pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("util", ">=1.0.1")]), ]); let mut config = Config::default().unwrap(); config .configure( 1, None, &None, false, false, &None, &["minimal-versions".to_string()], ) .unwrap(); let res = resolve_with_config( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1.0.0"), dep_req("bar", "1.0.0")], ®, Some(&config), ) .unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0"), ("util", "1.1.1"), ]), ); assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.2.2").to_pkgid())); assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.0.0").to_pkgid())); } // Ensure that the "-Z minimal-versions" CLI option works and the minimal // version of a dependency ends up in the lock file. #[test] fn minimal_version_cli() { Package::new("dep", "1.0.0").publish(); Package::new("dep", "1.1.0").publish(); let p = project() .file( "Cargo.toml", r#" [package] name = "foo" authors = [] version = "0.0.1" [dependencies] dep = "1.0" "#, ) .file("src/main.rs", "fn main() {}") .build(); p.cargo("generate-lockfile -Zminimal-versions") .masquerade_as_nightly_cargo() .run(); let lock = p.read_lockfile(); assert!(lock.contains("dep 1.0.0")); } #[test] fn resolving_incompat_versions() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2")), pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("foo", "=1.0.2")]), ]); assert!(resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "=1.0.1"), dep("bar")], ® ) .is_err()); } #[test] fn resolving_wrong_case_from_registry() { // In the future we may #5678 allow this to happen. // For back compatibility reasons, we probably won't. // But we may want to future prove ourselves by understanding it. // This test documents the current behavior. let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0")), pkg!("bar" => ["Foo"])]); assert!(resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("bar")], ®).is_err()); } #[test] fn resolving_mis_hyphenated_from_registry() { // In the future we may #2775 allow this to happen. // For back compatibility reasons, we probably won't. // But we may want to future prove ourselves by understanding it. // This test documents the current behavior. let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("fo-o", "1.0.0")), pkg!("bar" => ["fo_o"])]); assert!(resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("bar")], ®).is_err()); } #[test] fn resolving_backtrack() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2") => [dep("bar")]), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1") => [dep("baz")]), pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("foo", "=2.0.2")]), pkg!("baz"), ]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "^1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.1"), ("baz", "1.0.0")]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_backtrack_features() { // test for cargo/issues/4347 let mut bad = dep("bar"); bad.set_features(vec!["bad"]); let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2") => [bad]), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1") => [dep("bar")]), pkg!("bar"), ]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "^1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.1"), ("bar", "1.0.0")]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_allows_multiple_compatible_versions() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("foo", "2.0.0")), pkg!(("foo", "0.1.0")), pkg!(("foo", "0.2.0")), pkg!("bar" => ["d1", "d2", "d3", "d4"]), pkg!("d1" => [dep_req("foo", "1")]), pkg!("d2" => [dep_req("foo", "2")]), pkg!("d3" => [dep_req("foo", "0.1")]), pkg!("d4" => [dep_req("foo", "0.2")]), ]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("bar")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "2.0.0"), ("foo", "0.1.0"), ("foo", "0.2.0"), ("d1", "1.0.0"), ("d2", "1.0.0"), ("d3", "1.0.0"), ("d4", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0"), ]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_with_deep_backtracking() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1") => [dep_req("bar", "1")]), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "2")]), pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("baz", "=1.0.2"), dep_req("other", "1")]), pkg!(("bar", "2.0.0") => [dep_req("baz", "=1.0.1")]), pkg!(("baz", "1.0.2") => [dep_req("other", "2")]), pkg!(("baz", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("dep_req", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("dep_req", "2.0.0")), ]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "2.0.0"), ("baz", "1.0.1"), ]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_with_sys_crates() { // This is based on issues/4902 // With `l` a normal library we get 2copies so everyone gets the newest compatible. // But `l-sys` a library with a links attribute we make sure there is only one. let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("l-sys", "0.9.1")), pkg!(("l-sys", "0.10.0")), pkg!(("l", "0.9.1")), pkg!(("l", "0.10.0")), pkg!(("d", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("l-sys", ">=0.8.0, <=0.10.0"), dep_req("l", ">=0.8.0, <=0.10.0")]), pkg!(("r", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("l-sys", "0.9"), dep_req("l", "0.9")]), ]); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("d", "1"), dep_req("r", "1")], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_same( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("d", "1.0.0"), ("r", "1.0.0"), ("l-sys", "0.9.1"), ("l", "0.9.1"), ("l", "0.10.0"), ]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_with_constrained_sibling_backtrack_parent() { // There is no point in considering all of the backtrack_trap{1,2} // candidates since they can't change the result of failing to // resolve 'constrained'. Cargo should (ideally) skip past them and resume // resolution once the activation of the parent, 'bar', is rolled back. // Note that the traps are slightly more constrained to make sure they // get picked first. let mut reglist = vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "1.0"), dep_req("constrained", "=1.0.0")]), pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0.2"), dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0.2"), dep_req("constrained", "1.0.0")]), pkg!(("constrained", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", "1.0.0")), ]; // Bump this to make the test harder - it adds more versions of bar that will // fail to resolve, and more versions of the traps to consider. const NUM_BARS_AND_TRAPS: usize = 50; // minimum 2 for i in 1..NUM_BARS_AND_TRAPS { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push( pkg!(("bar", vsn.clone()) => [dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0.2"), dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0.2"), dep_req("constrained", "1.0.1")]), ); reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", vsn.clone()))); reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", vsn.clone()))); reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.clone()))); } let reg = registry(reglist); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0"), ("constrained", "1.0.0"), ]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_with_many_equivalent_backtracking() { let mut reglist = Vec::new(); const DEPTH: usize = 200; const BRANCHING_FACTOR: usize = 100; // Each level depends on the next but the last level does not exist. // Without cashing we need to test every path to the last level O(BRANCHING_FACTOR ^ DEPTH) // and this test will time out. With cashing we need to discover that none of these // can be activated O(BRANCHING_FACTOR * DEPTH) for l in 0..DEPTH { let name = format!("level{}", l); let next = format!("level{}", l + 1); for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())])); } } let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("level0")], ®); assert!(res.is_err()); // It is easy to write code that quickly returns an error. // Lets make sure we can find a good answer if it is there. reglist.push(pkg!(("level0", "1.0.0"))); let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("level0")], ®).unwrap(); assert_contains(&res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("level0", "1.0.0")])); // Make sure we have not special case no candidates. reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "1.1.0"))); reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "1.0.0"))); reglist.push( pkg!((format!("level{}", DEPTH).as_str(), "1.0.0") => [dep_req("constrained", "=1.0.0")]), ); let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("level0"), dep("constrained")], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("level0", "1.0.0"), ("constrained", "1.1.0"), ]), ); let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("level0", "1.0.1"), dep("constrained")], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), (format!("level{}", DEPTH).as_str(), "1.0.0"), ("constrained", "1.0.0"), ]), ); let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("level0", "1.0.1"), dep_req("constrained", "1.1.0")], ®, ); assert!(res.is_err()); } #[test] fn resolving_with_deep_traps() { let mut reglist = Vec::new(); const DEPTH: usize = 200; const BRANCHING_FACTOR: usize = 100; // Each backtrack_trap depends on the next, and adds a backtrack frame. // None of witch is going to help with `bad`. for l in 0..DEPTH { let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l); let next = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l + 1); for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())])); } } { let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", DEPTH); for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()))); } } { // slightly less constrained to make sure `cloaking` gets picked last. for i in 1..(BRANCHING_FACTOR + 10) { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!(("cloaking", vsn.as_str()) => [dep_req("bad", "1.0.1")])); } } let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("backtrack_trap0"), dep("cloaking")], ®, ); assert!(res.is_err()); } #[test] fn resolving_with_constrained_cousins_backtrack() { let mut reglist = Vec::new(); const DEPTH: usize = 100; const BRANCHING_FACTOR: usize = 50; // Each backtrack_trap depends on the next. // The last depends on a specific ver of constrained. for l in 0..DEPTH { let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l); let next = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l + 1); for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())])); } } { let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", DEPTH); for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push( pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep_req("constrained", ">=1.1.0, <=2.0.0")]), ); } } { // slightly less constrained to make sure `constrained` gets picked last. for i in 0..(BRANCHING_FACTOR + 10) { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.as_str()))); } reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "1.1.0"))); reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "2.0.0"))); reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "2.0.1"))); } reglist.push(pkg!(("cloaking", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("constrained", "~1.0.0")])); let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); // `backtrack_trap0 = "*"` is a lot of ways of saying `constrained = ">=1.1.0, <=2.0.0"` // but `constrained= "2.0.1"` is already picked. // Only then to try and solve `constrained= "~1.0.0"` which is incompatible. let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![ dep("backtrack_trap0"), dep_req("constrained", "2.0.1"), dep("cloaking"), ], ®, ); assert!(res.is_err()); // Each level depends on the next but the last depends on incompatible deps. // Let's make sure that we can cache that a dep has incompatible deps. for l in 0..DEPTH { let name = format!("level{}", l); let next = format!("level{}", l + 1); for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())])); } } reglist.push( pkg!((format!("level{}", DEPTH).as_str(), "1.0.0") => [dep("backtrack_trap0"), dep("cloaking") ]), ); let reg = registry(reglist.clone()); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("level0"), dep_req("constrained", "2.0.1")], ®, ); assert!(res.is_err()); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("level0"), dep_req("constrained", "2.0.0")], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[("constrained", "2.0.0"), ("cloaking", "1.0.0")]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_with_constrained_sibling_backtrack_activation() { // It makes sense to resolve most-constrained deps first, but // with that logic the backtrack traps here come between the two // attempted resolutions of 'constrained'. When backtracking, // cargo should skip past them and resume resolution once the // number of activations for 'constrained' changes. let mut reglist = vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "=1.0.0"), dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0"), dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0"), dep_req("constrained", "<=1.0.60")]), pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("constrained", ">=1.0.60")]), ]; // Bump these to make the test harder, but you'll also need to // change the version constraints on `constrained` above. To correctly // exercise Cargo, the relationship between the values is: // NUM_CONSTRAINED - vsn < NUM_TRAPS < vsn // to make sure the traps are resolved between `constrained`. const NUM_TRAPS: usize = 45; // min 1 const NUM_CONSTRAINED: usize = 100; // min 1 for i in 0..NUM_TRAPS { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", vsn.clone()))); reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", vsn.clone()))); } for i in 0..NUM_CONSTRAINED { let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i); reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.clone()))); } let reg = registry(reglist); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_contains( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0"), ("constrained", "1.0.60"), ]), ); } #[test] fn resolving_with_constrained_sibling_transitive_dep_effects() { // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives. E.g. // in the right-to-left resolution of the graph below, B may // affect whether D is successfully resolved. // // A // / | \ // B C D // | | // C D let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("A", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("B", "1.0"), dep_req("C", "1.0"), dep_req("D", "1.0.100")]), pkg!(("B", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("C", ">=1.0.0")]), pkg!(("B", "1.0.1") => [dep_req("C", ">=1.0.1")]), pkg!(("C", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("D", "1.0.0")]), pkg!(("C", "1.0.1") => [dep_req("D", ">=1.0.1,<1.0.100")]), pkg!(("C", "1.0.2") => [dep_req("D", ">=1.0.2,<1.0.100")]), pkg!(("D", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.2")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.100")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.101")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.102")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.103")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.104")), pkg!(("D", "1.0.105")), ]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("A", "1")], ®).unwrap(); assert_same( &res, &names(&[ ("root", "1.0.0"), ("A", "1.0.0"), ("B", "1.0.0"), ("C", "1.0.0"), ("D", "1.0.105"), ]), ); } #[test] fn incomplete_information_skiping() { // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives. // Fuzzing discovered that for some reason cargo was skiping based // on incomplete information in the following case: // minimized bug found in: // https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/003c29b0c71e5ea28fbe8e72c148c755c9f3f8d9 let input = vec![ pkg!(("a", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("a", "1.1.0")), pkg!("b" => [dep("a")]), pkg!(("c", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("c", "1.1.0")), pkg!("d" => [dep_req("c", "=1.0")]), pkg!(("e", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("e", "1.1.0") => [dep_req("c", "1.1")]), pkg!("to_yank"), pkg!(("f", "1.0.0") => [ dep("to_yank"), dep("d"), ]), pkg!(("f", "1.1.0") => [dep("d")]), pkg!("g" => [ dep("b"), dep("e"), dep("f"), ]), ]; let reg = registry(input.clone()); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("g")], ®).unwrap(); let package_to_yank = "to_yank".to_pkgid(); // this package is not used in the resolution. assert!(!res.contains(&package_to_yank)); // so when we yank it let new_reg = registry( input .iter() .cloned() .filter(|x| package_to_yank != x.package_id()) .collect(), ); assert_eq!(input.len(), new_reg.len() + 1); // it should still build assert!(resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("g")], &new_reg).is_ok()); } #[test] fn incomplete_information_skiping_2() { // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives. // Fuzzing discovered that for some reason cargo was skiping based // on incomplete information in the following case: // https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/003c29b0c71e5ea28fbe8e72c148c755c9f3f8d9 let input = vec![ pkg!(("b", "3.8.10")), pkg!(("b", "8.7.4")), pkg!(("b", "9.4.6")), pkg!(("c", "1.8.8")), pkg!(("c", "10.2.5")), pkg!(("d", "4.1.2") => [ dep_req("bad", "=6.10.9"), ]), pkg!(("d", "5.5.6")), pkg!(("d", "5.6.10")), pkg!(("to_yank", "8.0.1")), pkg!(("to_yank", "8.8.1")), pkg!(("e", "4.7.8") => [ dep_req("d", ">=5.5.6, <=5.6.10"), dep_req("to_yank", "=8.0.1"), ]), pkg!(("e", "7.4.9") => [ dep_req("bad", "=4.7.5"), ]), pkg!("f" => [ dep_req("d", ">=4.1.2, <=5.5.6"), ]), pkg!("g" => [ dep("bad"), ]), pkg!(("h", "3.8.3") => [ dep("g"), ]), pkg!(("h", "6.8.3") => [ dep("f"), ]), pkg!(("h", "8.1.9") => [ dep_req("to_yank", "=8.8.1"), ]), pkg!("i" => [ dep("b"), dep("c"), dep("e"), dep("h"), ]), ]; let reg = registry(input.clone()); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("i")], ®).unwrap(); let package_to_yank = ("to_yank", "8.8.1").to_pkgid(); // this package is not used in the resolution. assert!(!res.contains(&package_to_yank)); // so when we yank it let new_reg = registry( input .iter() .cloned() .filter(|x| package_to_yank != x.package_id()) .collect(), ); assert_eq!(input.len(), new_reg.len() + 1); // it should still build assert!(resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("i")], &new_reg).is_ok()); } #[test] fn incomplete_information_skiping_3() { // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives. // Fuzzing discovered that for some reason cargo was skiping based // on incomplete information in the following case: // minimized bug found in: // https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/003c29b0c71e5ea28fbe8e72c148c755c9f3f8d9 let input = vec![ pkg! {("to_yank", "3.0.3")}, pkg! {("to_yank", "3.3.0")}, pkg! {("to_yank", "3.3.1")}, pkg! {("a", "3.3.0") => [ dep_req("to_yank", "=3.0.3"), ] }, pkg! {("a", "3.3.2") => [ dep_req("to_yank", "<=3.3.0"), ] }, pkg! {("b", "0.1.3") => [ dep_req("a", "=3.3.0"), ] }, pkg! {("b", "2.0.2") => [ dep_req("to_yank", "3.3.0"), dep("a"), ] }, pkg! {("b", "2.3.3") => [ dep_req("to_yank", "3.3.0"), dep_req("a", "=3.3.0"), ] }, ]; let reg = registry(input.clone()); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("b")], ®).unwrap(); let package_to_yank = ("to_yank", "3.0.3").to_pkgid(); // this package is not used in the resolution. assert!(!res.contains(&package_to_yank)); // so when we yank it let new_reg = registry( input .iter() .cloned() .filter(|x| package_to_yank != x.package_id()) .collect(), ); assert_eq!(input.len(), new_reg.len() + 1); // it should still build assert!(resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("b")], &new_reg).is_ok()); } #[test] fn resolving_but_no_exists() { let reg = registry(vec![]); let res = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], ®); assert!(res.is_err()); assert_eq!( res.err().unwrap().to_string(), "\ no matching package named `foo` found\n\ location searched: registry `https://example.com/`\n\ required by package `root v1.0.0 (registry `https://example.com/`)`\ " ); } #[test] fn resolving_cycle() { let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo" => ["foo"])]); let _ = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], ®); } #[test] fn hard_equality() { let reg = registry(vec![ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0")), pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("foo", "1.0.0")]), ]); let res = resolve( &pkg_id("root"), vec![dep_req("bar", "1"), dep_req("foo", "=1.0.0")], ®, ) .unwrap(); assert_same( &res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0")]), ); } #[test] fn large_conflict_cache() { let mut input = vec![ pkg!(("last", "0.0.0") => [dep("bad")]), // just to make sure last is less constrained ]; let mut root_deps = vec![dep("last")]; const NUM_VERSIONS: u8 = 3; for name in 0..=NUM_VERSIONS { // a large number of conflicts can easily be generated by a sys crate. let sys_name = format!("{}-sys", (b'a' + name) as char); let in_len = input.len(); input.push(pkg!(("last", format!("{}.0.0", in_len)) => [dep_req(&sys_name, "=0.0.0")])); root_deps.push(dep_req(&sys_name, ">= 0.0.1")); // a large number of conflicts can also easily be generated by a major release version. let plane_name = format!("{}", (b'a' + name) as char); let in_len = input.len(); input.push(pkg!(("last", format!("{}.0.0", in_len)) => [dep_req(&plane_name, "=1.0.0")])); root_deps.push(dep_req(&plane_name, ">= 1.0.1")); for i in 0..=NUM_VERSIONS { input.push(pkg!((&sys_name, format!("{}.0.0", i)))); input.push(pkg!((&plane_name, format!("1.0.{}", i)))); } } let reg = registry(input); let _ = resolve(&pkg_id("root"), root_deps, ®); } #[test] fn conflict_store_bug() { let input = vec![ pkg!(("A", "0.0.3")), pkg!(("A", "0.0.5")), pkg!(("A", "0.0.9") => [dep("bad"),]), pkg!(("A", "0.0.10") => [dep("bad"),]), pkg!(("L-sys", "0.0.1") => [dep("bad"),]), pkg!(("L-sys", "0.0.5")), pkg!(("R", "0.0.4") => [ dep_req("L-sys", "= 0.0.5"), ]), pkg!(("R", "0.0.6")), pkg!(("a-sys", "0.0.5")), pkg!(("a-sys", "0.0.11")), pkg!(("c", "0.0.12") => [ dep_req("R", ">= 0.0.3, <= 0.0.4"), ]), pkg!(("c", "0.0.13") => [ dep_req("a-sys", ">= 0.0.8, <= 0.0.11"), ]), pkg!(("c0", "0.0.6") => [ dep_req("L-sys", "<= 0.0.2"), ]), pkg!(("c0", "0.0.10") => [ dep_req("A", ">= 0.0.9, <= 0.0.10"), dep_req("a-sys", "= 0.0.5"), ]), pkg!("j" => [ dep_req("A", ">= 0.0.3, <= 0.0.5"), dep_req("R", ">=0.0.4, <= 0.0.6"), dep_req("c", ">= 0.0.9"), dep_req("c0", ">= 0.0.6"), ]), ]; let reg = registry(input.clone()); let _ = resolve_and_validated(&pkg_id("root"), vec![dep("j")], ®); }