Add "Logic errors" as behavior not considered unsafe

In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80657 and
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80681 it is discussed
how to clarify/define what a "logic error" is and what are
their consequences. The reference should mention them as well.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Miguel Ojeda 2021-01-06 08:02:20 +01:00
parent 22c804a925
commit a7473287cc
1 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -36,4 +36,21 @@ semantics.
See [RFC 560] for error conditions, rationale, and more details about
integer overflow.
##### Logic errors
Safe code may impose extra logical constraints that can be checked
at neither compile-time nor runtime. If a program breaks such
a constraint, the behavior may be unspecified but will not result in
undefined behavior. This could include panics, incorrect results,
aborts, and non-termination. The behavior may also differ between
runs, builds, or kinds of build.
For example, implementing both `Hash` and `Eq` requires that values
considered equal have equal hashes. Another example are data structures
like `BinaryHeap`, `BTreeMap`, `BTreeSet`, `HashMap` and `HashSet`
which describe constraints on the modification of their keys while
they are in the data structure. Violating such constraints is not
considered unsafe, yet the program is considered erroneous and
its behavior unpredictable.
[RFC 560]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0560-integer-overflow.md