fix(rationale): Add more to why aggressive MSRV is fine

This commit is contained in:
Ed Page 2024-01-12 10:39:58 -06:00
parent 330eee4d53
commit 590e0850e6
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ This will encourage a baseline of quality as are developing with that version an
This will help seed the Index with more `package.rust-version` data for the resolver to work with.
The downside is that the `package.rust-version` will likely be higher than it absolutely needs.
However, considering our definition of "support" and that the user isn't bothering to set an MSRV themself,
aggressively updating is likely fine in this case.
aggressively updating is likely fine in this case, especially since we'll let dependents override the build failure for MSRV-incompatible packages.
Alternatively...